In a groundbreaking move, New York Governor Kathy Hochul has inked a transformative law set to be enforced in 2024, heralding a shift away from the sale of cats, dogs, and rabbits in pet stores. This progressive legislation, targeting the notorious “puppy mills” criticized for their commercial breeding practices, introduces a visionary approach. Pet shops are now encouraged to partner with shelters, fostering the adoption of rescued or abandoned animals, while breeders face a cap on selling no more than nine animals annually.
Senator Michael Gianaris, a key proponent of the law, underscored its significance by acknowledging New York’s historical role as a major player in supporting these mills. “This is a very big deal. New York tends to be a big purchaser and profiteer of these mills, and we are trying to cut off the demand at a retail level,” he stated.
However, amidst the applause, concerns loom. Critics argue that the legislation may fall short in addressing issues related to out-of-state breeders and raising care standards. Pet shops, echoing these concerns, fear that the law could spell closures for the remaining pet stores in the state.
Taking inspiration from California, which pioneered a similar ban in 2017, New York’s law distinguishes itself by not only encouraging collaboration with shelters but also implementing a restriction on breeders. In contrast, California’s legislation does not extend to regulating sales by private breeders.
This move aligns with a nationwide trend, as other states like Maryland and Illinois have already taken steps to curb the sale of cats and dogs in pet stores. Maryland’s decision in 2020 faced legal challenges from shop owners and breeders, while Illinois opted to restrict pet shops from selling commercially raised puppies and kittens in 2021.
Amidst the evolving landscape, pet advocacy groups in New York persist in their call for a complete shutdown of facilities engaged in profit-driven breeding and animal sales, citing inhumane conditions. Emilio Ortiz, a manager at Citipups pet shop in New York City, expressed his apprehension, noting that a substantial portion of their revenue is derived from selling dogs. He believes the ban could unfairly impact stores collaborating with responsible breeders, stating, “They’re closing the good actors along with the bad actors.” The outcome remains uncertain, sparking a crucial conversation about the intersection of animal welfare, commerce, and responsible practices in the pet industry.
Jessica Selmer, at the helm of People United to Protect Pet Integrity, a coalition championing pet store owners in New York, voiced strong reservations about the recently enacted law, labeling it as “careless” and “counterproductive.” Her optimism leans towards the prospect of Governor Kathy Hochul considering legislative adjustments to mitigate what she perceives as pitfalls in the bill.
Distinctively, the newly established law deliberately exempts at-home breeders who responsibly sell animals born and raised on their premises. Lisa Haney, a dedicated dog breeder based in Buffalo, finds herself in alignment with the law. She sheds light on concerns about certain pet stores, sourcing dogs from diverse locations, particularly large facilities in the Midwest.
According to Haney, the lack of transparency about the origin and breeding practices when purchasing a puppy is a significant issue.
Under the banner of Cavapoo Kennels, Haney’s breeding endeavors extend to producing hypoallergenic dogs, catering specifically to individuals with allergies.
Her business model adopts a need-based approach, with a carefully managed waitlist spanning six to 12 months to ensure each dog finds a loving and responsible home.
Senator Gianaris, an influential advocate for the law, argues that the legislation empowers buyers to make conscientious decisions regarding their pets’ origins. He underscores the impact of firsthand experiences, contending that visiting a mill and witnessing the conditions would dissuade consumers from supporting such operations. The law, according to Gianaris, promotes direct dealings with breeders, eliminating intermediaries that could potentially mask the unethical activities associated with mills.